experience with bringing "big" SLR camera - TravelPUNK Backpacker College Student Budget Travel Message Boards!



Go Back   TravelPUNK Backpacker College Student Budget Travel Message Boards! > Members Lounge > General Travel Tips, Education, Advice > Technology Inc.
Register All Albums FAQDonate Community Calendar

Technology Inc. Go-Go-Gadget Arm! All things from the 21st century that are suppose to make our trips and lives a little easier

Raileurope.com: See Europe by train
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-06-2005, 10:45 PM   #1
Members
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I'm debating whether to bring a "big" SLR camera or just stick with a small point and shoot.

has anybody actually brought a SLR with them while backpacking through europe? would you do it again?

thanks
__________________
SLR Diaries - My Trip to Europe
tinou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2005, 11:02 PM   #2
Members
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: near Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,239
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to chelseafc05
Default

i took a SLR when i went to vietnam and cambodia and it was the biggest pain in the ass i could of had.. i will be takin a smaller digital camera for my next trip

respect relatiiiiiive
__________________
http://www.travelblog.org/Bloggers/Danieljh/ <--- pictures of from eastern europe trip

Where ive been: Cộng Hňa Xă Hội Chủ Nghĩa Việt , Preăh Réachéanachâkr Kâmpŭchea, Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Česká republika, Slovenská republika, Magyar Köztársaság, Republika Slovenija, Republika Hrvatska, Bosna i Hercegovina, Republika Srbija, Republika Balgariya, Türkiye Cumhuriyeti, România, Rzeczpospolita Polska, Lietuvos Respublika, Latvijas Republika, Eesti Vabariik, Republiken Finland



MY NAME IS
Daniel
chelseafc05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2005, 11:10 PM   #3
Members
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by chelseafc05@Nov 7 2005, 12:02 AM
i took a SLR when i went to vietnam and cambodia and it was the biggest pain in the ass i could of had.. i will be takin a smaller digital camera for my next trip

respect relatiiiiiive
[snapback]85080[/snapback]
can you elaborate? was it just pain in the ass to carry around? were you too worry about theft?

__________________
SLR Diaries - My Trip to Europe
tinou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2005, 11:15 PM   #4
TPunk Recognized
 
Tadpole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: South Carolina, USA
Posts: 1,007
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to Tadpole
Default

Im not sure about the aspects of taking an SLR but I can touch on the digital camera aspect.

I am really big into film and othera aspects of that sort and it was hard to imagine simply just point and click pictures and not having the freedom to really get in the picture. But the small camera worked great. I was limited to getting really creative, beyond framing, but the amount of pictures I took and the ease of being so small and secure counterbalanced the restrictions of the camera.
__________________
"Sundace, I can't help you now."
~Butch Casady
Tadpole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2005, 11:26 PM   #5
Members
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: near Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,239
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to chelseafc05
Default

it was a pain in the ass to carry around becuse it didnt fit in my daypack..tried to take it around without the camera bag but that was just a bigger pain in the ass, and its annoying hangin it around your neck... i wasnt overly concerned about theft i was just smart how i carried when in the cities, ie not having it facing the same side of the road as there a "cowboys" on motorbikes that ride past and snatch it so i heard anyway. and was just careful where i put it down when at a bar/ resteraunt etc

also constantly havin to puttin it together and takin it apart is a bitch aswell
__________________
http://www.travelblog.org/Bloggers/Danieljh/ <--- pictures of from eastern europe trip

Where ive been: Cộng Hňa Xă Hội Chủ Nghĩa Việt , Preăh Réachéanachâkr Kâmpŭchea, Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Česká republika, Slovenská republika, Magyar Köztársaság, Republika Slovenija, Republika Hrvatska, Bosna i Hercegovina, Republika Srbija, Republika Balgariya, Türkiye Cumhuriyeti, România, Rzeczpospolita Polska, Lietuvos Respublika, Latvijas Republika, Eesti Vabariik, Republiken Finland



MY NAME IS
Daniel
chelseafc05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2005, 12:50 PM   #6
***** gear guru
 
kingcrazylegs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 6,299
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via ICQ to kingcrazylegs Send a message via AIM to kingcrazylegs Send a message via MSN to kingcrazylegs Send a message via Yahoo to kingcrazylegs
Default

I bring my SLR whenever I travel. I don't find it a problem at all. You just have to be prepared for the bigger camera. Though a smaller camera might be easier due to size, I take photography to heart and so I want to have my best equipment. It is all how you mentally prepare I think
__________________

all that is not given is lost
kingcrazylegs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2005, 06:36 PM   #7
TPunk Recognized
 
ajb3000's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: London, England
Posts: 502
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

I just took a "point and click", albeit a decent one, and came back with some amazing pictures. Fitted easily in my pockets so was always on hand for when I came across those picture perfect moments. An SLR would (IMO) just be added weight you could do without, unless of course the whole purpose of the trip is to take photos.
__________________
Where I've been: Albania, Australia, Belguim, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Cambodia, Canada, Colombia, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Egypt, Ethiopia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Holland, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Jersey, Jordan, Kosovo, Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Latvia, Lebanon, Macedonia, Malaysia, Mexico, Moldova, Monaco, Morocco, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Seychelles, Singapore, Slovenia, Somaliland, Spain, Sudan, Sweden, Switzerland, Syria, Thailand, Transnistria, Turkey, Turkmenistan, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United States, Ukraine, Uruguay Uzbekistan, Vatican City, Vietnam, Yemen

Where I'm going: Cyprus (June 2013)
ajb3000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2005, 01:27 AM   #8
Don't cut the red wire...
 
The Monsignor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,419
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via MSN to The Monsignor Send a message via Yahoo to The Monsignor
Default

It also seriously depends on your photo purposes... If you normally just take photos for memory sake, aren't particularly worried about detail, rather you use the photos as a visual reminder of happy travel memories, well, a point-and-shoot is the way to go...

If you're like me, the devil is in the details... I have so much to absorb during a trip that I really like detailed photos so that I have something to look at when I return home, and perhaps pick details out that I may have missed on the trip... An SLR (or really decent digital) for me is the way to go. The nice part of a high MP camera is that you can make up for your composition shortcomings by cropping and enlarging. Details that you failed to notice in person are still captured forever on film/pixels and when I go through my vacation photos, I get to take the trip all over a second time, from a different perspective...

For me, the weight is worth it... (though I need to find a different tripod)



«edit» I also carry a small point-and-shoot digital for those opportunity photos where carrying anything bigger would be impractical... the worst photos are the ones you don't take cause you forgot your camera!
__________________
"A bad carpenter always blames his tools!" - Grandpa Boris

Make war, not love! It's safer!


The Monsignor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2005, 07:48 AM   #9
Sandwich Magician
 
PlayPal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Montreal now, WA st. Originally
Posts: 350
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to PlayPal Send a message via Skype™ to PlayPal
Default

I bought a digital rebel about a year ago and though it was a really nice camera, I found that I still took way more pictures with my little 4 year old Canon S300 digital point and shoot. Being able to be inconspicuous with a camera is a huge factor in my opinion. You pull out a big photo cannon and it attracts attention, possibly detracting from an otherwise natural setting. Then there is the obvious just-stick-it-in-your-pocket-and-go factor. These days you can get high megapixel counts on point and shoots as well, though you still don't get the lens quality and flexibility, color / light accuracy, or manual controls of an SLR. I recently sold my Digital Rebel and am thinking of buying a new point and shoot when I can afford it. Has anybody been doing any research on them recently? Looking to spend $400 or less.
__________________
Let there be adventure.
PlayPal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2006, 05:25 AM   #10
Members
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 58
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

i would luv to take my SLR backpacking with me but it is bigger and heavier and film is more expensice and I wouldnt want it to get stolen or damaged. That said a digicamera can be stolen or damaged but it is lighter and I dont have to buy film and can send images home instantly.
Munkeyrach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2006, 02:55 PM   #11
Members
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 15
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by PlayPal@Nov 11 2005, 11:48 AM
I bought a digital rebel about a year ago and though it was a really nice camera, I found that I still took way more pictures with my little 4 year old Canon S300 digital point and shoot. Being able to be inconspicuous with a camera is a huge factor in my opinion. You pull out a big photo cannon and it attracts attention, possibly detracting from an otherwise natural setting. Then there is the obvious just-stick-it-in-your-pocket-and-go factor. These days you can get high megapixel counts on point and shoots as well, though you still don't get the lens quality and flexibility, color / light accuracy, or manual controls of an SLR. I recently sold my Digital Rebel and am thinking of buying a new point and shoot when I can afford it. Has anybody been doing any research on them recently? Looking to spend $400 or less.
[snapback]86170[/snapback]
I have come to the conclusion that photography is about a third technology, lucky, and the skill of the photographer. I have a pretty average 4 megapixel A520 by Canon and i feel like I have wonderful photos. I decided to blow several up to 11"x14" (28x36cm for metric lovers/the rest of hte world) Where Is Joey Todayif you want a sample I have a few on my travel blog.

--Joey
Joey7F is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply







Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
My Annual Catering Industry "I Hate The Holidays" bitch space virgin General Discussions 18 12-12-2006 10:52 AM
"Personal Protection Items" Euro-Legal? Resolve Health & Safety 1 09-22-2005 10:27 AM
Putting the "kook" in "cuckoo" space virgin Bored? Links/Jokes 5 07-06-2005 06:57 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:29 PM.



 

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 (Unregistered)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121