Digital Cam vs. Film - Page 2 - TravelPUNK Backpacker College Student Budget Travel Message Boards!



Go Back   TravelPUNK Backpacker College Student Budget Travel Message Boards! > Members Lounge > General Travel Tips, Education, Advice > Technology Inc.

Technology Inc. Go-Go-Gadget Arm! All things from the 21st century that are suppose to make our trips and lives a little easier

Raileurope.com: See Europe by train
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-30-2004, 02:28 PM   #21
TPunk Recognized
 
Ozpacka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 647
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thought i might add my two cents to this, as i, as have you, have been tossing this up in my head for quite some time.

Pros 4 digital.
smaller
no film
viewing screen

Cons 4 digital
loose ya camera, loose all ya pics
battery life
cost

I dont take all that many photos anyways, and the ones that i normally take are of scenery. This annoys me, cuz when i get home all my pictures look the same. Thats where i guess a digital would be handy. I was also looking into APS camera. They are film cameras, the size of digital cameras (cannon) and have the options of 3 different sized photos, including panaramic. But, as with digital they are still expensive.

So, my answer is to find a small 35mm camera, with a zoom for a little as possible. Because, i guess the biggest thing for me, is the size. Last time i flew over, my 35mm was a pain, cuz it was too big for my pocket and stuck out a mile.

Anyrate, just my two cents. Ill let you all know what i end up with.

leeroy
__________________

Travelpunk - More extreme than your Mum!
Ozpacka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2004, 04:20 AM   #22
TPunk Recognized
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Kent, UK
Posts: 226
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

My sister has an aps camera, and the only thing she found, was that the films for aps are as easy to buy as 35mm. They aren't that worldwide yet. But she does have a rather nice camera!

For sending my films home, I'm gonna collect a load up, and put them in a parcel and send them. Easy. I'm always sending parcels off to new zealand for my boss, and they get there ok. Ahhh, they'll be ok! Quit giving me squashed film paranoia!
***Beady*** is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2004, 04:12 AM   #23
TPunk Emeritus
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Perth, Australia.
Posts: 1,246
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Does anyone know about storage/memory cards?? Like how many pics a 128/256 card will hold? Say for example a 3.2 megapixel
__________________
urOZm8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2004, 09:37 AM   #24
Yoda
 
space virgin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Hell
Posts: 5,533
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

as far as I know, it depends on what resolution you shoot the picture in. If you shot in 3mp mode, on a 128mb card you could get around 100+/- pictures, and on a 256 you could get 215 +/-. But you're probably not always going to shoot each and every picture in the highest resolution setting, so that will give you more room on the card.
__________________
Various bloggings (Version 2.0)
space virgin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2004, 08:23 PM   #25
TPunk Recognized
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 235
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to cliffo Send a message via Yahoo to cliffo
Default

urOZm8,

Check this link for a guide as to how many shots you can get on a certain size card. This is only a guide though as you can change quality settings like SV mentioned:

Memory Card Capacity
cliffo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2004, 10:01 AM   #26
Members
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY,NY
Posts: 53
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to LittleMiss1565
Default

STOP THE PRESSES!!!

-if you're not interested in my long-winded explanation, I understand-scroll down to the bottom of my post-

This post had me in a bit of a panic, only because I don't believe that digital is the be all and end all of quality photography. I used to (and by used to I mean that's the job I left before I went to Europe and i haven't worked anywhere else since) work in a photo lab, where one of my responsibilities was printing digital photos using a Noritsu 2901- which uses the same chemistry for printing film onto photographic paper. There are definite pros and cons to either system. At work we had daily meetings about this stuff.

IT ALL DEPENDS on what you want to do with the final picture! If you forsee taking a great shot to enlarge to 16X20 then DO NOT use digital. A lot of the digital prints I made had to undergo a whole lot of adjusting just to make an 8X10 that didn't look like absolute shite.

Film

I take hundreds of pictures when I travel, and I usually process rolls as I go or bring some home with me. However, you have to remember that if you wait too long to get the film processed your rolls can get heat/age fogged. Yes, this can be costly but if your bottom line is high quality, then this is the way to go. Sending rolls home can be a problem in that you can never be sure what kind of conditions your package will be subjected to along the way. For a while, at my photo lab, we saw a lot of rolls come in through our mail-in service that were damaged by irradiation. Heat in general can be an issue ( i wouldn't worry so much about squashing). Some people do this with no problem, but all it takes is that one fluke to ruin your day. My recommendation would be to get the prints and send those home.
APS cameras may be small but the system is obsolescent (and actually quite inconvenient if you want reprints and don't have the index print anymore-you can't look at the film), at least in the US. Some labs won't even process the stuff anymore, and others will soon follow suit.

Take care of your negatives!

By the way, digital is not taking over film and the quality for the same price is not automatically better.

Digital

Digital is great if you are just taking party pictures and random snapshots.If you are absolutely sure you only want to use the pics for e-mail or the web then digital would be best. It is very easy to completely destroy your digital images. The memory card may mysteriously corrupt, and you can lose all of your images. Some people mess around with their photos on their computer so much that they end up making irreversible errors on them. If you take all of your huge image files and decided to compress them into one convenient little zip file, or adjust the sizes so you can fit them onto one disk, then you are not going to like the prints you get from them if you take them to a photo lab. Pixelation, poor cropping etc. etc. blah blah blah. You better have the original files, without any adjustments whatsoever, saved somewhere. I could go on for a while. Digital still has a lot of bugs to work out, I mean come on, it is a relatively new technology in the big scheme of photography. it's nice to be able to see the shot immediately but the trade-off, depending on your priority, may or may not be worth it.

and if you do decide to take your memory card to a photo lab, don't go to one-hour places. They do first-run (as do many labs) and will not adjust for density and color. It may be cheap, but it isn't worth it. Seek out a quality lab. Same for film! And you can always just put the images you want printed onto a CD and have the lab print them.

-------------------------------------------------
this is the bottom part

That being said, on my last trip I took a 35mm SLR and a 3megapixel digital camera. By far the best shots I have are on film. I was able to find net cafes here and there that allowed me to upload photos to the web, and some places also let me scan prints.

If you're not a photographer, but you want to be able to make enlargements, I'd say go out and get a good quality 35mm point-and-shoot camera with a zoom. To get close to that quality in digital could cost over a thousand dollars.

If you do decide to buy a digital camera don't settle for the best-buy/wal-mart stuff. Go somewhere that concentrates strictly on photography. If I may plug my almamater, try Dan's Camera City for info and purchasing.

It's all a personal decision, and again, it all depends on what you want to do with the final image.
__________________
(Hey, check it out. My member number is 7!)

Restlessme.net- My Travel Diary. Check it out
LittleMiss1565 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2004, 03:38 PM   #27
An Optimistic Realist.
 
Sijuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Detroit / Las Vegas
Posts: 3,353
Thanks: 2
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Sijuki Send a message via MSN to Sijuki Send a message via Yahoo to Sijuki
Default

Like I have said I haven't been completely sold on Digital.. that is why I still trust my Canon Rebel EOS SLR. It has proven to be excellent for the price. And it has taken loads of abuse, being left in the rain, frozen, extreme heat, etc.
__________________
.~Sijuki~.



2009-2014: February - Mexico (Cancun x 3, Cozumel x 1, Mazatlan x 2

2014 : Europe: Norway, Denmark, Hungary, Czech Rep, Germany, France, England

2015 : US:Yellowstone, Grand Teton, Joshua Tree NP, Salton Sea, Grand Canyon, Petrified Forest, Mt. Rushmore. 20 states. Europe: Stockholm, Barcelona, Madrid, Prague, Krakow, Warsaw, Ireland (month driving around), Northern Ireland, Edinburgh.

2017 : Dublin, South Africa, Grand Cayman (planned)

Need a Railpass for that Trip to Europe?
Or Maybe a Hostel Reservation?
Frog Creek Brewing -- Upcoming Microbrewery

Sijuki@gmail.com
Sijuki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2004, 03:56 AM   #28
TPunk Emeritus
 
worldwidemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Columbus, Ohio USA
Posts: 3,405
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Nice post, LittleMiss! Thanks for the info...

worldwidemike
__________________
Check out my travel web page at:
Worldwidemike.com
"Life is not measured in the number of breaths we take, but by the places that take our breath away..."
worldwidemike is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply






Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
book/film club beergal Arts, Entertainment, Books 30 08-12-2005 09:55 AM
Cannes Film Festival Jaimie7777 General Travel Tips and Advice 4 02-28-2005 12:08 AM
Indie Film Makers Book... WestCoastKyle Arts, Entertainment, Books 0 01-15-2005 05:49 PM
hilarious foreign film SovietSurfer Bored? Links/Jokes 3 03-09-2004 11:42 AM
Film ElGato Health & Safety 1 02-17-2003 07:20 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:16 AM.



 

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121